 |

 


 
 |
“I am less interested in performance and more interested in…using
the studio to extend the parameters of performance,” he says. “I make
absolutely no distinction between composer or musician with that of
sound engineer or producer.” While valuing improvisation’s “spontaneity
and immediacy,” his intention in working with improvisers is to achieve “a
level of control and finesse that is not normally possible in a strictly
improvised recording situation.” Samartzis’ relationship to “musicians” is
not exactly antagonistic, but an editorial impulse presides heavily over his
method. But then maybe a little antagonism in measure is not a bad thing.
“The thing I find interesting about musicians,” he nudges, “is that they
seem compelled to always make sound,” disdaining “all the stuff that
appear[s] to have very little purpose other than filling up space.” This is key.
Spatial articulation and silence are sacred here, the syntactic pillars of his
personal grammar. Samartzis is a composer of gesture, and the gut
strength of his results advances the idea of transformation and
spatialization as legitimate, under-recognized compositional devices.
Derived in part from the cinema, he wonders at the way experience is
shaped in complex transactions between seeing and hearing, and silence.
“If I had the opportunity I would love to put the individual members of
Slayer onstage in soundproofed glass boxes so that you could see them play
but not hear them…a live mix that focused on various aspects of each
performer, as well as merging them from time to time to create densities of
space and discrete zones of aural experience. Silence would play a major
part of the presentation.” Investing in un-programmed intuition and
curiosity, Samartzis describes the largest obstacle confronting his students,
particularly those with musical training or sound art backgrounds, as, “the
assumptions that they have made about art and life. The thing I try and do
is break down those assumptions so that each student can make an
objective assessment…so that they can decide for themselves what is
meaningful and what isn’t…”For Samartzis, sound culture is “a fragile thing”
with boundaries beyond those derived from the requirements of traditional
performance avenues. He created and curates the Immersion Festival as a
forum for exploring “space as part of their compositional practice” and
continues to underwrite alternative spatial sound works in an effort to keep
fluid the understanding of what sound can do.
Samartzis offers guidance for an interrogator perhaps overly mired in
analytical reason. “The question you should have asked is ‘what is my
favorite sound?’The answer is ‘a woman in high heels walking in an empty
public square in Venice sometime after midnight in March.’”
|
 |
     

     
 |